Cash boost for disabled people's groups
With the economy hurting, small disabled people’s bodies are
in pain, especially if they lack the clout to fundraise. But, as Sunil
Peck reports, help is at hand
It’s rare these days for the Government to announce a policy that
doesn’t provoke outrage among disabled people, so the Minister for
Disabled People, Maria Miller, could be forgiven for thinking she’s
made a breakthrough by receiving a welcome for her launch of a scheme
worth £3m over four years to promote the growth and strengthening of
user-led organisations.
The scheme will be overseen by Rich Watts, Director of Policy and
Development at the Essex Coalition of Disabled People (ECDP). He will
be seconded to the Office for Disability Issues for half a week each
week.
Under him will be 12 regional ambassadors responsible for promoting user-led organisations and spreading good practice.
Commenting on his new post, Rich Watts said: “Leading this programme
is a great opportunity to raise the profile of disabled people’s
user-led organisations and to sustain and share the successes they
achieve, including providing the support that disabled people really
need.
“Working with a team of ambassadors, we will share our skills and
experience with other organisations, as well as learn from them and
pass on their knowledge, to ensure that disabled people are heard at
every level.”
Rich Watts certainly has a job on his hands because, as the minister
admits, there are areas of the country where, unlike Essex, user-led
organisations either don’t exist or lack the ability to provide peer
support .
Speaking to Disability Now, Maria Miller said: “We’re trying to move to
a situation with personal budgets and the right to control ... Having
strong and robust and well-organised user-led organisations is
critical.
“Disparate provision is a strength and a weakness. It’s a strength
because we can take the expertise of those in areas with more developed
centres for independent living, like the Vassall Centre in Bristol,
which provides an amazing resource by providing access for people to
see different types of wheelchairs, equipment to support them in the
kitchen, bathroom and bedroom and expertise to go with it. Elsewhere,
that’s not something which has been thought of.”
Typical project-funding bids will not be more than £10,000. Higher bids
will be considered but no organisation will receive more than £30,000
in total during the four-year scheme.
One example of how a user-led organisation might benefit from the fund,
according to the minister, would be to help them set up schemes similar
to that run by the Vassall Centre, which sells to the local authority a
service that lets people try out equipment.
“Another example of how the money could be used would be to train staff
in user-led organisations to improve the services they offer or to
provide new services. I’m thinking of an independent living centre in
West Sussex, that identified a market and now has a thriving service
with a very well developed database of personal assistants.”
Some disabled people have suggested that the scheme is simply an
attempt by the Government to appease those angered by welfare cuts.
Maria Miller of course denies this and says the move is consistent with
the Government’s aim of promoting choice and independence.
It remains to be seen if £3 million is enough to boost user-led
organisations. One area hoping to benefit is the North East, where the
provision of peer support currently lags behind that in areas like
Essex and Bristol.
Gordon Pybus, the Chair of Darlington Association on Disability, is
keen to bid for funding and is cautiously optimistic that the level of
peer support in areas like his can be raised. As he puts it, “Lots of
people might say that this is too little too late. But we’d sooner have
something than nothing. The money is never too little if it’s focussed
right. It’s true that people have been losing their benefit money under
this Government, but we’ve helped a lot of people to appeal and to get
their rights and if we weren’t doing that, who would be?”


