Skip to content.

Colour
  • Colour option 1
  • Colour option 2
  • Colour option 3

Document Actions

Independent Living Fund to close

Sunil Peck

Richard HawkesThe fears of disabled people about the future of the Independent Living Fund (ILF) have been confirmed by the announcement that the fund is to close by 2015.

The ILF, set up in 1988, provides money to more than 20 thousand disabled people with high support needs to live independently at home out of residential care.

Fears for the ILF's future intensified In June when the coalition government announced that the fund would be closed to new applicants for the remainder of the financial year.

Ian Burnip, a 24-year-old ILF service user said: “I have relied on the ILF to enable me to go to university, obtain a BSc and an MA, and live independently in the community I choose. This has allowed me to develop and maintain key friendships with people from all walks of life, and live what society would deem a perfectly normal life. Without the financial support provided by the ILF I could not have done this.

Eleanor Lisney, co-founder of the user led organisation Disabled People Against Cuts, said: "with the Disability Living Allowance changes and the forthcoming scrapping of the ILF, I do not see how the minister, Maria Miller, can still mention independent living and fairness. It seems obvious that she needs to meet more disabled people and understand the desperate and perilous conditions that these changes can be making to disabled people’s lives."

Rich Watts, director of Essex Coalition of Disabled People, said "When taken in combination with the proposed changes to Disability Living Allowance announced last week, it's nothing short of an out-and-out attack on disabled people."

Jim Elder-Woodward, Convenor of the user-led project Independent Living in Scotland, said That it was "sad" and "disappointing" that a government containing Liberal Democrat ministers who he said have a "caring and supportive outlook in terms of older and disabled people", were being "railroaded" by the "nasty" conservatives.

He said: "You shouldn't close the ILF without a clear idea of how you're going to be paying the benefits in a universal system promoting independent living for disabled people. The government wants local authorities to take over the funding of personalisation. But if they're cutting local authorities' funding by ten per cent, they're not going to be able to fund the millions that the ILF has funded in the past."

Richard Hawkes (pictured), Chief Executive of Scope, described the decision to close the ILF as "bemusing" because it did not square with the government's pledge to promote choice and control for disabled people.

He said: “Alongside hefty cuts to local government budgets and central government budgets, the deletion of the Independent Living Fund is piling yet more pressure on the already stretched support systems for disabled people and will undoubtedly lead to more disabled people having their choices limited – and their opportunities for contribution and participation being reduced."

The minister for disabled people Maria Miller said that following a review and informal consultations with disability organisations and representatives from local government and the Department of Health, the coalition government had decided that the ILF was "financially unsustainable".

She said that the coalition government had made safeguarding the position of existing recipients a priority and that there would be a consultation in 2011 to determine what happens to ILF recipients when the fund closes.

Independent Living Fund.

Posted by John Hargrave at 29 Dec 10 08:58
Perhaps Maria Miller would like to tell us which 'disability organisations' she has held informal discussions with regarding the abolition of the Independent Living Fund. To get rid of the ILF will only diminish the life chances of many more people who have severe disabilities, how much lower will the government go, in depriving disabled people of much needed resources to better their lives.

Miller

Posted by sarntcrip at 20 Jan 11 11:04
Maria is just one in a long line of ineffectual moinisters for people with disabilities using the position as a junior career stepping stone
just like another Maria who did nothing for the section of society she represented, she being Maria Eagle these people should be reported under the trades description act they should be renamed ministers for self advancement and inactionover issues concerning disabled peopleI'm luckyI've only been disabled twelve years and two assessments carried out byproperly qualified people who took one look at me and wondered why they had been sent so obviousis my incapacity to even get to work let alone hold down a job but in my 12 years of disabilitythere has not been one minister for disabled people
who has done anything to improve the lot of disabled people, for fear ofrocking the party boat there is no effective representation other than Anne Begg we are sadly now an underclass given subsistence to exist not live, out of sight out of mindIt's all very depressing

demolition of independent living fund

Posted by s.m. h. at 16 Mar 11 21:08
During the 80's there were changes made within our society that allowed severely disabled members of families to live with family members. This has been done with with both a struggle in meeting emotional needs for all family members, due to extra demands and worries, and a high cost being paid by main carers. Carers are often parents (or 'parent' due to the high divorce rate within this sector for obvious reasons)who have given up interests, careers and sadly their sense of self. What has allowed them to carry on has been the thought of their dependent 'adult' being included in daily activities that they don't have to be responsible for. When this is no longer provided who will pick up the pieces? If the carer has managed to remain in employment will they be expected to give this 'sanctuary' up? Do we once agian roll out the asylums to say we care?

Independent Living Fund to Close

Posted by Inva at 12 Dec 11 12:27
The hypocrisy re independence, the work ethic and helping those most in need makes sense when one realizes that what governments mean when they use such phrases is 1. their personal financial security. 2. To receive as much money as possible from Lobbyists in the private sector for the opportunity to ware-house the elderly and the disabled in non-care homes and skim profits for investment vultures. And to understand that those most in need are their friends in the financial sector who reward them with vast sums of money as executive directors for a attending a couple of meetings a year.

Maria Miller

Posted by Inva at 12 Dec 11 12:50
also interesting to note that Maria Miller {added to her salary] allowances claimed - see Govt website for expenses 2010 April - March added up to a total of £44,148.14 I assume to ensure her independence - is this sustainable one asks