Skip to content.

Colour
  • Colour option 1
  • Colour option 2
  • Colour option 3

Document Actions

Disablism: a call to action

Society’s institutional negativity towards disabled people is reflected, says Andy Rickell in how its institutions treat or mistreat us. And action to combat it is required at the highest level

Being the Minister for Disabled People in a government committed to imposing welfare reforms that may negatively impact on many disabled people is hardly anyone’s dream job. So when there is an opportunity for the
Minister to ally herself with huge swathes of disabled people, and influence the rest of government on our behalf, we need to encourage her to grab it with both hands.

I have just been listening to the latest report, this time from the Care Quality Commission, on the appalling care given to older people in 100 hospitals across the country, brought to the public’s attention following unannounced inspections. People not being fed or given water appropriately, others left in their own excrement, and others denied basic wishes regarding their own care. This feels like déjà vu, all over again! It seems only a few months ago we had exactly the same findings. The hospital bosses wring their hands, nursing representatives are flummoxed about how such things can happen, everyone scratches their heads about how such lack of care can happen in a “caring” environment in a “caring” society. Everyone acknowledges that older people should be treated with respect and dignity, but are unable to consistently deliver it.

Here in Bristol there was the Winterbourne View residential home debacle – the astoundingly appalling treatment of people with learning difficulties in the one place that was supposed to be delivering the best care that should be on offer, only brought to light after the BBC televised it in May 2011. Recently the Equality and Human Rights Commission produced their report, “Hidden in Plain Sight”, about disability hate crime. And I never forget my own “favourite” incident of a disabled man attacked by a barman in a Cambridge pub for “exaggerating his impairment”.

Such incidents are not only not isolated, they are actually intimately connected. Once you realise that older people needing hospital care are all disabled people too, all these incidents illustrate the worst end of discriminatory treatment of disabled people.

The underlying problem here is “disablism”! Let’s name it! Winterbourne View and this hospital survey should become to disablism what Stephen Lawrence was to racism – a wake-up call that it exists, red in tooth and claw, and that it is institutional in all bodies who deal with disabled people, including the NHS, social care providers and the police. This is not about money, not about austerity – it’s about British citizens being appallingly treated
in and by British society, including the British state and voluntary organisations. It needs to be changed.

Here is an opportunity for the Minister to show her mettle – to take up the battle against institutional disablism in the name of all those disabled people who find themselves made vulnerable by a system and society that routinely excludes them and in some cases forces them into institutional settings. There are lots of us disabled people who would be allies with her in such a battle – able to offer our advice and time to win that battle – but we need someone to take the fight to the highest levels.

Disablism.

Posted by Gordon Bailey at 30 Jan 12 22:08
A problem that I have found, as been a disabled person is the image used to represent the disabled, the wheel chair image is miss representative of disabled in general. often when getting out of my car in the blue badge parking spot you now that people look at you and think you shouldn't be parking there. but not all disability's are as visible as a person in a wheel chair, so why are we all generalised by this out dated symbol so why can't we change it for something more fitting for everyone, its not just the blue badge thing, but there seems in general too be a disability negativity over the whole field of the disabled, the government says if you have a condition that last more than twelve weeks then they look upon this as a disability, but that's it as far as the government are concerned, whether you have a skin condition, or a heart condition. they are both disability's in the governments eyes, but one is probably more life threatening than the other, but the government doesn't draw any difference when it comes down to benefits.I know of a person who has a serious heart condition, and has been told that they will need a heart transplant at some point in the future, but this person is unable to claim any benefits what so ever, and when I mean any benefit I mean she can't claim a penny at all, she has no income at all, she can't get D,L,A, she can't get Incapacity benefit, she can't get Job seekers allowance, she gets sweet F,A, so where's the justice and fairness for a disabled person who needs a heart transplant at some point, needs drugs to keep her alive, has an I,C,D, implant fitted to act as a paramedic in case her heart stops. why is she discarded by this government and a system that allows none residents of this country to come in from eastern Europe and the can claim everything. so is this Disablism and how can this person get action, also because she's not on any benefits she also has to pay for her medication and at £7.40 per item it would be nearly £45.00 for the items she needs to keep her alive, if it was not for her partner and the prepayment cert's, she would not know what too do or who too turn to. if you want to comment on this or if you can show any help or assistance to this person would be greatly appreciated.