Avoiding the pitfalls of minding your language
Recent rows over the use of language on Twitter have prompted
Mike Oliver to consider whether what is sometimes not said is of greater
importance than what is
The Tzwitterati are beginning to take over the virtual worlds in which
we all seem to spend more and more of our time. A good example of this
is the recent outrage sparked by John Terry when he called a fellow
footballer a black so and so. I don’t know if the England captain is
racist or not but I do know that sportsmen and women have always
verbally abused each other to gain an advantage.
I do also know that very few black players ever go on to manage
professional footballer clubs. In fact of the 92 managers of football
league clubs only one is black at present. I haven’t seen the Twitterati
calling that racist.
What’s this got to do with disability you might ask? Well, we do seem to
have become obsessed with language while ignoring more important issues
in the disability world.
For example, a couple of years ago I got a call from a journalist on our
local TV news show. An American wheelchair manufacturer had decided to
call their new wheelchair “the spazz”. A local supplier had agreed to
become an agent for this new wheelchair and the journalist wanted
someone to express outrage at this.
I said I would be happy to do this but only if I could also talk about a
far more outrageous story; namely the state of our local wheelchair
service where many people were waiting for months and even years to get
the right kind of wheelchair.
There was a stunned silence and the journalist said he would talk to his
editor and call me back. I’m still waiting for the phone call though he
did get his story which went out that night with a non-disabled
representative of one of the big charities expressing outrage at the use
of the term spazz. Our local wheelchair service is still in a terrible
state but, as yet, there has still not been any coverage of it.
I’m not against people being sensitive about language and I think using
hate speech should be a criminal offence, but if we are only concerned
about language we fail to confront bigger and more important issues that
we need to deal with.
Many years ago in his pioneering research carried out by the then
British Council of Disabled People and the Rowntree Foundation, Colin
Barnes suggested that institutional discrimination was the biggest
problem facing disabled people and this could only be addressed by
changing people’s behaviour and not just their attitudes and the
language that underpins it.
When I listen to the Twitterati banging on about disability I sometimes
want to scream “you can call me a cripple if you want but don’t you dare
deny me a roof over my head, a decent education and a proper job”.


