Designing for Bespoke solutions
From gratifying sexual positioning to a hospital gown which
doesn’t leave your dignity in shreds, Mike Shamash checks out a variety
of products designed with disability in mind and on show at a
mainstream design exhibition
As disabled people, we’re made aware of how the world around us is not
something that emerges organically out of nothing but is something that
is constructed by human beings for human beings. Sadly, those doing the
designing and constructing of this world pay little attention to the
needs of those with different physical and sensory needs. Design
becomes yet another barrier.
I was made aware of these feelings when I went to see the 2011 Brit
Assurance Designs of the Year show at the Design Museum in London.
I was expecting to see a range of beautifully designed products that do
not acknowledge the existence of disability. I was pleasantly surprised
to see a small cluster of products that were specifically designed for
the disabled person.
The first product that I came across was the Leveraged Freedom Chair
that was designed in the USA but in conjunction with organisations of
disabled people in Kenya, India and Guatemala. This is a wheelchair
that is designed with a levered gear for outdoor use, that attached to
the bicycle drivetrain means that it can go over rough terrain more
suited to the mountain bike from which it borrows much of its
technology. The gears can be detached and stored within the frame,
making it a conventional wheelchair for indoor use. The components used
are cheap, widely available bike parts but the end result isn’t simply
liberating it’s also a funky bit of kit.
Adjacent to it is the British designed One Arm Drive System which is an
elegant wheelchair that can be driven from one side, making it ideal
for people with limited mobility or with only the use of one arm. This
is much more the high-tech designer end of the mobility products
market, with the components being high quality aluminium using the
latest technology and with the option of further levels of
customisation as required. Both these products offer massively
contrasting solutions to ensuring good design becomes an integral part
of the large and largely ignored disability products market. Though
disability is global it exists within differing cultural and economic
contexts.
The purpose of the next product I saw was initially unclear. It looked
like a rather elegant bench with a chair that could be moved by a
gentle gliding motion. This is the IntimateRider which is a product
that aims to enhance sexual positioning and mobility for those with
little or no lower body movement. The gentle swaying motion provides
enough leverage to guarantee comfortable sexual positioning. It is
designed by an American designer, Alan Tholkes, a quadriplegic for his
own personal use. It is lightweight and can be packed in a compact
carry case. There is also a supporting website and online blog to allow
fuller examination and discussion. It is a wonderful concept that is
stylish and provides an answer to a problem that a conventional
able-bodied designer could not even contemplate, or for which many
might well be too prudish to design a solution. Good design should
improve the sum total of people’s lives and this does it in spades.
Two other designs that address particular issues faced by disabled
people throughout the world are See Better to Learn Better and the
Universal Gown.
See Better to Learn Better is a design jointly evolved in the USA and
Mexico. The aim is to provide through the Mexican government free eye
tests for young people and the provision of attractively designed
specs. The young people could choose the colour and design. This in
turn would ensure that educational opportunities weren’t hindered by
poor vision. The aesthetic appeal becomes a means of social equality.
All too often the little good design for disability products is
available only for the affluent few. This design challenges this
assumption.
The Universal Gown’s a hospital gown that is fastened by press studs at
both sides and across the shoulder so that patients are not exposed in
an undignified and demeaning manner. It has been designed by the
British fashion designer, Ben de Lisi, for comfort and ease of
movement. It is reversible and extra panels can be added to clothe the
larger patient.
These are designs that are elegant solutions to specific problems and
all challenge the norm of disability being ugly and hence every product
has to be grey or beige and unwieldy or ill-fitting. There is still
much work to be done to respond to the specific needs of disabled
people. Areas such as furniture and fashion design still seem inured to
the wishes of the physically diverse. Yet, in these particular designs
I am aware that an awakening has begun. About time too!


